Author: admin

Daniel Kokotajlo is the founder of the AI Futures Project and a former OpenAI researcher who worked on forecasting, AI governance, and safety. In this full interview with Business Insider, he explains what AGI and superintelligence mean, why AI agents could be the turning point, and what could happen if the AI race continues without strong safeguards. He also lays out what he thinks governments and companies can do now to reduce the risk of losing control.

• I lived at home when I was a college student, and so did my husband.
• I felt like I missed out on a lot of the college experience, so I want my kids to live on campus.
• Thankfully, we saved up enough so they can afford room and board.

I’ve spent the past year touring colleges with my high school senior, and I’ve found myself thinking a lot about my own college experience — and coming to a surprising conclusion.

Even though my husband and I both lived at home during college and saved a significant amount of money, I want our three kids to live on campus.

Our oldest will start college in fall 2026, and one of their top choices is a school just 20 minutes from our house. It would be incredibly easy — and practical — for my college-bound child to stay at home. No room and board, no meal plan fees, no extra expenses. Just a short drive to school and back home.

For a long time, I assumed that’s what we would encourage. But somewhere between campus tours, dorm walkthroughs, and campus life presentations, my thinking changed. I realized I don’t just want my kids to go to college, I want them to experience living on their own, too.

My husband and I both loved living at home during college

I chose that path because I was a first-generation college student, and my parents hadn’t set aside money for my education. While they helped with college expenses, I still graduated with some student loan debt. By living at home, I was able to get my degree for a reasonable price.

My husband’s situation was similar. He’s the youngest of 10 kids, and in a big family, commuting to a local college was just expected. He didn’t even have a car at first; he took the bus to class and worked his way through school, ultimately graduating debt-free.

At the time, these choices made sense. College was more affordable in the 1990s, and commuting was an easy way to keep costs down. Today, we’re looking at roughly $25,000 per year in college costs, and about half of that is for room and board.

But our situation is also different. We’ve been saving for our kids’ college since they were born, and we’re in a position to cover those costs. Our three kids will be able to graduate debt-free, even if they live on campus.

While commuting saved me money, it also came with trade-offs

I lived about 30 minutes from campus, and getting there, especially for early morning classes, was a daily struggle. I’ve never been a morning person, and the added hassle of a commute made it even harder. There were classes I skipped simply because I couldn’t get myself out the door in time to make it to my seat by 8 a.m.

Being off campus also made it harder to feel connected. I joined a sorority and met friends through clubs, but I was always a bit removed from what was happening on campus. Staying late for meetings or events meant factoring in a drive home.

I worked on the campus literary magazine, but missed too many meetings to stay involved. Over time, it became easier to opt out of activities and events than to keep commuting back and forth.

And that’s something I don’t want my kids to experience.

I want my kids to build independence by living on their own — not under our roof

It’s important to me that they learn what it’s like to live with people outside our family. They’ll have to share space with roommates, navigate disagreements, and solve problems without Mom and Dad intervening. They’ll get the opportunity to live side by side with people from different backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences.

They’ll also get the chance to manage daily tasks like doing their own laundry, making meals, and getting enough sleep without me stepping in to remind them to have good habits. We’ve already started working on some of these skills at home, but there’s a difference between practicing independence and actually living it.

There are also some real benefits to living on campus. Without a commute, my kids will have more time to study, visit professors during office hours, and take part in campus life. I hope they’ll be more likely to join clubs, attend events, and form lifelong friendships with the people they meet.

To me, living on campus is a bridge between childhood and full adulthood. It offers structure, but also freedom. It’s a chance to make decisions, make mistakes, and grow while still having a supportive, safe environment at college.

Of course, I know commuting works well for many students. For some families, like mine and my husband’s, commuting is the only way they can send their child to college. Living at home can also offer a level of safety and structure that campus life doesn’t.

But for our family, we’re in a position to make a different choice — and we are.

• When my flight-attendant application was accepted, the airline placed me in Hartford, Connecitcut.
• I was disappointed, especially since I grew up in the South and New England winters sounded awful.
• Three years later, I love so much about living in Connecticut and swear it’s the best place to live.

I was living in Louisiana, feeling miserable in my postgrad 9-to-5, when I saw a LinkedIn post that changed my life: an application to become a flight attendant.

The job sounded thrilling, and if I got it, I knew the airline would decide where I’d live next. Luckily, I was ready for a change.

Although I loved Louisiana, the idea of potentially moving across the country sounded exhilarating. So, I applied, got accepted into my training program, and not-so-patiently waited for my airline to tell me where I was going.

Less than two weeks before I was supposed to leave for training, I got the news that I was going to be based in Hartford, Connecticut. I freaked out and called my friends in tears.

I’d never even been to Connecticut, and as someone who grew up in the South, I could already picture myself being miserable in the cold, snowy New England winters. I also couldn’t imagine there was much to do in such a small state I’d heard little about.

It wasn’t my top choice — I’d wanted a base with year-round warm weather — but assignments can just come down to an airline’s staffing needs at the time. After a day or so, I calmed down and began warming up to my fate.

“If nothing else, it’ll be an adventure,” I kept telling myself. I never imagined how well the placement could’ve worked out for me.

It didn’t take me long to fall in love with Hartford and New England in general

I arrived in Hartford in October, during the peak of New England’s fall foliage season.

Immediately, I was blown away by how pretty it was outside with all of the bright-yellow, red, and orange leaves. I realized I’d never lived somewhere with real, distinct seasons before.

Even when the weather got colder, living here wasn’t as bad as I expected. Since New England is equipped to deal with the cold and I had bought a new warmer wardrobe, I actually thought the winter felt more bearable in some ways than it was in the South.

Even now, I love the variety we get with our seasons. Winter is my least favorite, but everything blooms beautifully in the spring.

Summer in New England is wonderfully charming, and of course, the fall leaves are my favorite. Their beauty never gets old.

I was so disappointed when I got my assignment that I also didn’t realize just how exciting it would be to go from living in small towns to a real city.

I’d spent the first 18 years of my life in a town in Texas so small it didn’t even have a stoplight, and the next four in my Louisiana college town of 18,000 people. By contrast, Hartford has a population of over 100,000.

I’d never lived in a walkable area, but now, I could step straight out of my apartment and go on a stroll through Hartford’s downtown shops and restaurants.

It sounds mundane, but I even found it fun getting to shop at big chains like Trader Joe’s and Whole Foods for the first time and make them regular parts of my routine.

I’ve never run out of things to see and do here

My worries about running out of things to do were unfounded, too.

Once I began researching what there was to see and do in this tiny state on Instagram and TikTok, I found tons of options, including local festivals, museums, and beaches.

Some of my favorite local adventures I’ve been on include visiting my first cider mill, exploring a pick-your-own tulip field, and seeing real reindeer at a Christmas tree farm.

On top of that, I suddenly had access to so many new activities. One of my favorite parts of exploring my new home was trying new fitness studios and workout methods I’d never had access to before.

I’ve always loved hiking, but it was previously reserved for vacations since I didn’t live near many trails. Now, I can open the AllTrails app and find endless hikes in my own state.

It’s been 3 years since I moved, and I’m convinced this is the best state to live in

And, in my opinion, Connecticut is the best place to live in New England because of its central location. I’m about a two-hour drive from Boston and a two-hour drive from New York City.

I can get to the beach in an hour, or drive two and a half hours and be in the mountains of Vermont or New Hampshire. Cape Cod, Martha’s Vineyard, and even Maine are easy drives for a weekend trip.

I’m now three years into living in Connecticut, and I still haven’t run out of things to do. I still keep an ever-growing list in my notes app of restaurants and coffee shops I want to try.

I often think about how grateful I am that I got the flight-attendant base I didn’t want. I love New England, I love Connecticut, and I can’t imagine being happier anywhere else.

• Monaco, which came out of stealth earlier this year, is developing AI software to automate sales.
• Monaco announced Tuesday that it raised a $50 million funding round led by Benchmark.
• This is the first deal longtime investor Jack Altman has made since joining Benchmark.

Monaco had no revenue in February. Three months later, the AI sales startup says it is adding more than $1 million in revenue every month. That kind of hockey stick growth is what turned Benchmark’s newest partner, Jack Altman, into a believer and landed the startup a fresh $50 million round.

Monaco announced Tuesday it raised a $50 million Series B funding round led by Benchmark, bringing its total funding to more than $85 million. Altman, the former Lattice CEO and brother of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who joined Benchmark earlier this year, will join Monaco’s board.

Returning investors Founders Fund and Human Capital also participated in the round. The valuation was not disclosed.

The raise is the latest example of how quickly capital is flowing into AI startups, especially those that show strong revenue growth. Companies are increasingly raising massive rounds only months after launching products publicly as investors race to back potential category leaders early.

“We launched in February, we had no revenue,” founder and CEO Sam Blond told Business Insider. “During February, March, and April, we added seven figures of ARR each month, and revenue is accelerating.”

Monaco is developing AI software to automate key parts of the sales process, including prospecting, outbound outreach, pipeline management, and customer tracking. Blonde wants the company to be known as the “Cursor of sales,” referring to the popular AI coding startup that made a $60 billion deal with SpaceX.

‘When stuff works, it works fast’

It used to be startups waited years, not months, to raise a Series B, but these are not normal times. Just two months ago, Monaco announced a $25 million Series A round led by Founder’s Fund, where Blond was a partner until 2024.

Altman said Monaco’s early traction was part of what convinced Benchmark to move quickly.

“I think in general, when stuff works, it works fast,” Altman said. “You back great people as early as you can back them.”

Still, Altman said the investment decision ultimately came down to Blond, a former Brex and Zenefits sales executive who spent two years in VC before saying that he missed being an operator.

“I think it’s really all about the founder,” Altman said.

The startup is part of a crowded, increasingly competitive market that includes incumbents like Salesforce and HubSpot, as well as a wave of newer AI-native challengers such as 11x, Artisan, and Aurasell.

“Generally speaking, any good software market is going to be competitive,” Altman said. “But my view on it was very clearly that the momentum is night and day and that what Sam and Monaco are doing is just dramatically faster than what I’m seeing at other places.”

Altman said the flood of money pouring into AI startups has naturally raised questions about whether the industry is entering bubble territory.

“We’re in a moment when a lot of capital is available, markets look very big, there’s a real technology disruption happening,” Altman said. “There will be a correction because there has always been one. What we don’t know is whether it’s tomorrow or in seven years. You just don’t know.”

Blond said Monaco did not need to raise another round so quickly after, as it had roughly $24 million in the bank. Adding Altman to the board was a key factor, and Monaco can use the additional capital to hire engineers, which does not come cheap these days.

“There are things that we will be able to do with this infusion of capital that we will use to accelerate that lead,” he said. “Despite being at it for far less time, we are moving much, much faster than the others in the space.”

Monaco has quickly been building buzz in Silicon Valley through its ubiquitous billboards and a high-end poker tournament it hosted last month that offered $100,000 in prize money. Altman said plans to play in the startup’s next tournament in June.

“I love poker,” he said. “Though I’m a little rusty,”

• University of Michigan’s $20 million bet on OpenAI could yield billions, a court exhibit shows.
• The school’s investment arrived before Microsoft poured billions into the AI lab.
• OpenAI’s meteoric rise means the potential for huge windfalls for early investors.

University of Michigan made a very good, very early bet on OpenAI.

Investors running the public school’s endowments put $20 million into one of the AI lab’s earliest fundraising efforts, according to an exhibit in the ongoing Elon Musk and Sam Altman litigation. The University of Michigan moved in before Microsoft invested billions into OpenAI and before ChatGPT’s release kicked off the modern AI boom. The Ann Arbor school stands to make a fortune.

While the document is unclear about the exact terms of Michigan’s stake, the university is sitting pretty. When it contributed $20 million, it set a “target redemption amount” of $2 billion. That’s how much the university aims to earn back from OpenAI.

The university’s $20 million stake arrived in the same early cluster as $50 million investments from Khosla Ventures and from LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman’s venture philanthropy fund, the Aphorism Foundation. The batch also included $10 million from a Y Combinator fund and $3 million from the trust of Gmail creator Paul Buchheit. Microsoft’s 2019 infusion of $1 billion came later, the document shows.

The University of Michigan and the other early investors would be prioritized above Microsoft in OpenAI’s payout order, the document says. Their “target redemption amounts” also rise with inflation.

The University of Michigan and OpenAI did not respond to requests for comment from Business Insider.

It’s common for endowments to invest with Silicon Valley venture capitalists, though it’s rarer to see a direct stake. Michigan’s total endowment is huge — valued at $21.2 billion last year — and has also invested with Sam Altman’s and his brother Jack Altman’s venture funds.

Dan Feder, who leads the university endowment’s venture capital and private equity investments, joined Jack Altman’s podcast last June. Feder said that venture capital is “a pretty lousy area to invest unless you are investing or getting exposure to the underlying companies that really matter.”

Altman replied, “In which case it’s obviously very good.”

“It’s very good. Very, very good,” Feder said.

The University of Michigan wouldn’t be the only school to make a killing from an early tech investment. In 2017, a Catholic high school in the San Francisco Bay Area made $24 billion from Snap’s IPO.

Have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at scouncil@businessinsider.com, or over text, Signal, Telegram, or WhatsApp at 415-757-8198. Use a personal email address, a nonwork WiFi network, and a nonwork device; here’s our guide to sharing information securely.

• Kevin O’Leary says people have misconceptions about what data centers are.
• O’Leary is building a data center in Utah despite community resistance.
• Data center development has become a serious issue for many American communities.

Many Americans don’t like the AI data centers popping up in their communities, though Kevin O’Leary thinks that’s because they don’t fully understand them.

O’Leary, the venture capitalist and “Shark Tank” investor who recently starred as a villainous businessman in “Marty Supreme,” said Americans have misconceptions about data centers and their environmental impact.

“It’s understanding the concerns of people, but at the same time, think about the number of jobs,” O’Leary said in a post on X on Friday.

Addressing environmental worries, O’Leary noted that he graduated from the University of Waterloo with a degree in environmental studies.

“When a group comes to me and says, ‘Look, I have concerns about water, I have concerns about air, I have concerns about wildlife,’ I totally get it,” O’Leary said.

O’Leary has clashed with residents in Box Elder County, Utah, over a new AI data center he’s backing on a 40,000-acre campus.

County commissioners approved the project, which is also backed by Utah’s Military Installation Development Authority, on Monday despite the community opposition. O’Leary said, without providing evidence, that the criticism mainly came from “professional protesters” who were “paid by somebody.”

One major concern for residents about the data center — dubbed the Stratos Project — is that it could strain the water supply. Data centers can use millions of gallons of water each day. Increased utility bills, noise, and a drop in quality of life are also points of contention.

O’Leary said the public misunderstands the impact of data centers because they were “poorly represented” in the past, and that the technology powering them has “advanced dramatically.” He said data centers don’t use as much water as they once did and can use a closed-loop system to avoid evaporation. Data centers can also rely on air-cooled turbines as an alternative to managing the temperature of the computer arrays, he said.

A fact sheet published by Box Elder County said the project won’t divert water from the nearby Great Salt Lake, agriculture, or homes. It also says that Stratos won’t increase electricity prices or taxes.

Many residents, however, are not so sure. The Salt Lake Tribune reported on Thursday that an application to divert water from the Salt Wells Spring stream, near the Great Salt Lake and long used by a local ranch for irrigation, was rescinded after nearly thousands of Utah residents lodged complaints.

“At some point, understanding the value of sustainability, water and air rights, indigenous rights, and making sure the constituencies understand what you’re doing is going to be more valuable than the equity you raise,” O’Leary said on X.

Anjney Midha, a Stanford University adjunct lecturer who appeared on the “Access” podcast this week, would agree with that sentiment. He said that listening to local communities and being transparent about the intentions and impacts of data centers are essential to making them work.

“My view is that if it’s not legible to the public that these data centers and the infrastructure required to unblock this kind of frontier technology progress are serving their benefit, then it’s not going to work out,” Midha said.

In a subsequent post on X on Friday, O’Leary said his project would be “totally transparent.”

“We want it to be the shining example of how you do this,” he said.