Skip to main content

Author: admin

What happened after Elon Musk took the Russian army offline

A computer screen
Drone footage gathered by the Ukrainian military shows widespread battlefield use of Starlink terminals by Russian troops.
  • SpaceX shut down Russian troops’ access to Starlink satellite-internet terminals.
  • The change constrained Russian military capabilities and created opportunities for Ukrainian forces.
  • In the days following the shutdown, Ukraine recaptured roughly 77 square miles in the country’s southeast.

This story originally ran in Welt and appears on Business Insider through the Axel Springer Global Reporters Network.

“All we’ve got left now,” the Russian soldier said, “are radios, cables and pigeons.”

A decision earlier this month by SpaceX to shut down access to Starlink satellite-internet terminals caused immediate chaos among Russian forces who had become increasingly reliant upon the Elon Musk-owned company’s technology to sustain their occupation of Ukraine, according to radio transmissions intercepted by a Ukrainian reconnaissance unit and shared with the Axel Springer Global Reporters Network, to which POLITICO and Business Insider belong.

The communications breakdown significantly constrained Russian military capabilities, creating new opportunities for Ukrainian forces. In the days following the shutdown, Ukraine recaptured roughly 77 square miles in the country’s southeast, according to calculations by the news agency Agence France-Presse based on data from the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War.

Three men sitting at brown desks in military fatigues
Analysts in Ukraine’s Bureviy Brigade eavesdrop on Russian communications from an underground listening post in northeastern Ukraine.

SpaceX began requiring verification of Starlink terminals on Feb. 4, blocking unverified Russian units from accessing its services. Almost immediately, Ukrainian eavesdroppers heard Russian soldiers complaining about the failure of “Kosmos” and “Sinka” — apparently code names for Starlink satellite internet and the messaging service Telegram.

“Damn it! Looks like they’ve switched off all the Starlinks,” one Russian soldier exclaimed. “The connection is gone, completely gone. The images aren’t being transmitted,” another shouted.

Dozens of the recordings were played for Axel Springer Global Reporter Network reporters in an underground listening post maintained by the Bureviy Brigade in northeastern Ukraine. Neither SpaceX nor the Russian Foreign Ministry responded to requests for comment.

“On the Russian side, we observed on the very day Starlink was shut down that artillery and mortar fire dropped drastically. Drone drops and FPV attacks also suddenly decreased,” said a Ukrainian aerial reconnaissance operator from the Bureviy Brigade who would agree to be identified only by the call sign Mustang, referring to first-person view drones. “Coordination between their units has also become more difficult since then.”

The satellite internet network has become a crucial tool on the battlefield, sustaining high-tech drone operations and replacing walkie-talkies in low-tech combat. Since Russia’s February 2022 invasion, which destroyed much of Ukraine’s traditional communications infrastructure, Western governments have provided thousands of the Starlink units to Kyiv.

A man in military fatigues with a Ukrainian flag on his shoulder.
At some point, it felt like the Russians had more devices than we did,” said a Ukrainian soldier identified by the call sign Mustang
Walkie talkies under red light on a shelf

With the portable terminals, there is no need to lay kilometers of cable that can be damaged by shelling or drone strikes. Drone footage can be transmitted in real time to command posts, artillery and mortar fire can be corrected with precision, and operational information can be shared instantly via encrypted messaging apps such as Signal or Telegram.

At the outset of the Russian invasion, Starlink access gave Ukraine’s defenders a decisive operational advantage. Those in besieged Mariupol sent signs of life in spring 2022 via the backpack-size white dishes, and army units used them to coordinate during brutal house-to-house fighting in Bakhmut in 2023.

Satellite internet became “one of, if not the most important components” of Ukraine’s way of war, according to military analyst Franz-Stefan Gady, an adviser to European governments and security agencies who regularly visits Ukrainian units. “Starlink constituted the backbone of connectivity that enabled accelerated kill chains by helping create a semi-transparent battlefield.”

The operational advantages of Starlink did not go unnoticed by Russian forces. By the third year of the war, Starlink terminals were increasingly turning up in Russian-occupied territory. One of the first documented cases surfaced in January 2024 in the Serebryansky forest. Month by month, Ukrainian reconnaissance drones spotted more of the devices.

The Ukrainian government subsequently contacted Musk’s company, urging it to block Russian access to the network. Mykhailo Fedorov, then digital minister and now defense minister, alleged Russian forces were acquiring the devices via third countries. “Ukraine will continue using Starlink, and Russian use will be restricted to the maximum extent possible,” Fedorov pledged in spring 2024.

Yet Russian use of the terminals continued to grow throughout 2025, and their use was not limited to artillery or drone units. Even Russian infantry soldiers were carrying mini Starlink terminals in their backpacks.

“We found Starlink terminals at virtually every Russian position along the contact line,” said Mustang. “At some point, it felt like the Russians had more devices than we did.”

In the listening post this month, he scrolled through more than a dozen images from late 2025 showing Russian Starlink terminals set up between trees or beside the entrances to their positions.

“We targeted their positions deliberately,” Mustang continued. “But even if we destroyed a terminal in the morning or evening, a new one was already installed by the next morning.”

In the Russian-occupied eastern Ukrainian city of Kreminna, there was even a shop where soldiers could buy Starlink terminals starting in 2024. According to Ukrainian officials, these devices were not registered in Russia.

SpaceX’s move in early February to enforce a stricter verification system effectively cut off unregistered Starlink terminals operating in Russian-occupied areas. Only devices approved and placed on a Ukrainian Ministry of Defense “whitelist” remained active, while terminals used by Russian forces were remotely deactivated.

“That’s it, basically no one has internet at all,” a Russian soldier said in one of the messages played for Axel Springer reporters. “Everything’s off, everything’s off.”

The temporary shutdown allowed Ukraine to slow the momentum of Vladimir Putin’s forces, although the localized counteroffensives do not represent a fundamental shift along the front. Soldiers from other Ukrainian units, including the Black Arrow battalion, confirmed the military consequences of the Starlink outage for Russian forces in their sectors in interviews with the Axel Springer Global Reporters Network.

By mid-February, Russian shelling had increased again, though largely against frontline positions that had long been identified and precisely mapped — suggesting that Russia has yet to fully restore all of its lost capabilities.

Now, analysts from the Bureviy Brigade say Russian forces are scrambling for alternatives. They have been forced to rely far more heavily on radio communication, according to Mustang, which creates additional opportunities for interception.

Russian units will likely attempt to switch to their own satellite terminals. But their speed and connection quality are significantly lower, Mustang says. And because of their size, the devices are difficult to conceal.”The shutdown of Starlink, even if only of limited effect for now, highlights the limited ability of the Russian armed forces to rapidly implement ongoing cycles of innovation,” said Col. Markus Reisner of the Austrian Armed Forces. “This could represent a potential point of leverage for Western supporters to provide swift and sustainable support to Ukraine at this stage.”

Ibrahim Naber is a chief reporter at Welt.

Read the original article on Business Insider

I moved to Coral Gables for my dogs. I’m spending almost $2,000 more in rent, but we get to walk everywhere.

Woman posing with two French Bulldogs
The author moved to a more expensive neighborhood in Miami for her dogs.
  • I chose a more expensive neighborhood because it’s dog-friendly.
  • I pay $4,700 a month in rent to prioritize my dogs’ quality of life.
  • Moving to a different ZIP code gave us a more walkable, community-centered life.

I’ve learned that there are three types of dog owners in the world: those who have dogs but treat them like pets with basic needs, those who absolutely love their dogs and spoil them, and those who treat their dogs like children.

I’m proudly in the third category.

I grocery shop for my dogs so I can home-cook their meals. I buy them Christmas presents, post photos of them on their Instagram account to more than 12,000 followers (whom I reply to on their behalf), take them to photoshoots and brand partnerships, and got them European passports so I can take them on vacation with me.

Not only that, but I play Bluey, SpongeBob SquarePants, and meditation music for them while I’m busy working to keep them entertained. I let them lick my vanilla ice-cream cone, and they sleep in my bed, cuddled under the covers at night.

But all of those things directly align with my lifestyle and the tasks I already do regularly; however, six months ago, I did the most drastic thing in my life for their benefit. I moved zip codes, prioritizing their well-being.

I chose a neighborhood where I could walk with them everywhere

Last year, while deciding where to move, I focused on finding a neighborhood where I could walk almost everywhere and bring them with me, while feeling safe walking at any hour of the day or night. After researching the best neighborhoods in the city for dog parents, all signs pointed to Coral Gables — one of the most expensive and also most dog-friendly areas in Miami.

French bulldogs on bed
The author is paying almost $2,000 more in rent for her dogs to have a better lifestyle.

Moving to Coral Gables from Doral meant switching from an apartment with a $2,500 monthly rent to one with a $4,700 a month rent. While that is a drastic shift in rent pricing I’m choosing to make, given my current priorities and the lifestyle I want my dogs to have, it makes sense. People always say, “You’re paying for the location,” and quite frankly, that’s never felt more true to me.

Many of the residential buildings in Coral Gables allow pets, which takes the stress off people who need to move but can’t find dog-friendly places. Since the dog culture is so pronounced in this part of Miami, many buildings make it acceptable to have more than one dog.

I moved from Europe to Florida with my dogs

I lived in Europe for nearly five years — three of them in London, then the South of France, and finally Rome — before moving back to Florida in 2022. While in London, I became a dog mom after someone gifted me Bentley for Christmas.

Woman in Rome with dogs
The author moved from Europe back to Miami with her two dogs.

During my time in Europe, I never owned a car because public transportation made getting around effortless. When I moved to Miami, that was what I missed most. Since moving back, I’ve been eager for something that comes as close as possible to the life I lived in Europe, with the dog-friendly energy that comes with it.

My French Bulldogs have many special needs. Being brachycephalic, they can only walk at certain temperatures, which means our walks have to happen during specific hours of the day so it’s not too hot. They also need to maintain a healthy weight, since excess weight can affect their backs and ligaments. Frenchies are prone to skin allergies as well, which I’ve never seen manifest in mine — and I credit that to their fully home-cooked diet.

Dog in the alps
The author wanted a lifestyle that allowed her to take her dogs with her.

While we often get compliments at the vet for being among “the healthiest Frenchies” they’ve ever seen, that level of care comes with real responsibility and sacrifice. Owning a French Bulldog means shaping your lifestyle around its health and wellness needs. I never planned to have this breed, but life had other plans, and I ended up with two that I love with my whole heart.

They’re my buddies, my besties, and I’m grateful I found a place in Miami that makes me miss Europe a little less — while giving me more time to simply be with them and involve them in my daily activities.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Larry Summers is leaving his Harvard teaching job following the release of personal emails with Jeffrey Epstein

Larry Summers
Larry Summers says he is stepping back from public life.
  • Larry Summers is retiring from Harvard amid Epstein email fallout and ongoing investigations.
  • Emails reveal Larry Summers sought advice from Jeffrey Epstein on a romantic relationship.
  • Harvard is continuing to investigate Summers’ ties to Epstein.

Former US Treasury Secretary and Harvard University President Larry Summers is leaving his position as a professor at the elite university, he said in a statement on Wednesday.

“I have made the difficult decision to retire from my Harvard professorship at the end of this academic year,” Summers said in a statement. “I will always be grateful to the thousands of students and colleagues I have been privileged to teach and work with since coming to Harvard as a graduate student 50 years ago.”

The retirement is the latest fallout for Summers over his relationship with the now-dead sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Files released by the Justice Department and House Oversight Committee in recent months shed new light on Summers’ relationship with Epstein, who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. Epstein pleaded guilty to less severe sex offenses in 2008.

Emails show the former Treasury Secretary sought Epstein’s advice on pursuing a romantic relationship with a woman he described as a mentee. Summers also made a sexist remark about women’s intelligence in his emails with Epstein.

Epstein, in one email, called himself Summers’ “wingman.”

A Harvard University spokesperson said Wednesday that Summers also resigned as the co-director of the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government, a research center.

Summers has been on leave from his teaching duties at Harvard since November and will remain on leave until the end of the academic year, the university spokesperson said.

Summers said in his own statement that he planned to continue working — just not as a Harvard professor.

“Free of formal responsibility, as President Emeritus and a retired professor, I look forward in time to engaging in research, analysis, and commentary on a range of global economic issues,” Summers said.

Harvard announced in November that it opened a new investigation into Epstein’s relationship with Summers. That review remains “ongoing,” the university spokesperson said.

Last year, Summers was barred from the American Economic Association and resigned from the OpenAI board over his relationship with Epstein.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Homeowners in these 20 states have the lowest property tax rates in the US. See how the states rank.

Suburban houses in California
Homeowners in the US pay annual real estate taxes on their properties, varying by state.
  • Property taxes are among the many factors to consider when buying a home in the US.
  • New Jersey has the highest property tax rate, which is nearly eight times the country’s lowest.
  • Hawaii has the lowest real estate taxes in the country, despite having the highest-valued homes.

Owning a home is increasingly feeling more out of reach for many Americans.

One of the many factors that add to the pressures and challenges of homeownership is the ongoing cost of property taxes, which persists even after a property is paid off.

For some, property taxes are little more than an afterthought, while for others, they can be a significant financial setback on top of mortgage or insurance payments.

A recent WalletHub study looked at the tax burden of owning real estate across the US and ranked all 50 states by the effective tax rate paid by homeowners in the state. The study used data from the US Census Bureau.

“Property taxes represent a recurring cost that can significantly affect financial planning, savings capacity, and long-term affordability,” Mitchell Franklin, an accounting professor at Le Moyne College in New York, said in the study. “Even if a home’s purchase price appears manageable, high property taxes can dramatically increase the overall cost of ownership and strain household budgets.”

Across the country, states like New Jersey and Illinois top the charts with the highest tax rates of 2.11% and 2.01% respectively.

In New Jersey, the owners of a home priced at the state’s median home value, which in the state is $454,400, pay an annual $9,590.

Meanwhile, in states like Alabama, which has the second-lowest real estate tax rate in the country, the owners of a home at the state’s median home value, which in this case is $209,900, pay about $788 each year.

These 20 US states have the lowest real estate tax rates. See how they rank.

20. Virginia
Northern Virginia Suburbs, Virginia, USA - Aerial view of Town homes, houses man-made ponds and gated communities in the suburbs of Northern Virginia near Leesburg

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.73%

State median home value: $383,700

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $2,790

18. (tie) Montana
Aerial view of Willow Creek, Montana

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.72%

State median home value: $375,800

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $2,693

18. (tie) Mississippi
New development single family houses near row of manufactured, modular, and mobile homes in Richland, Rankin County, Mississippi suburb Jackson, USA lush green trees. Aerial view affordable housing

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.72%

State median home value: $169,800

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $1,215

16. (tie) New Mexico
Albuquerque New Mexico Homes Aerial view

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.70%

State median home value: $248,100

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $1,731

16. (tie) California
Aerial View of Napa, California during Summer

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.70%

State median home value: $734,700

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $5,124

15. North Carolina
Aerial view of new homes in a housing development with tree lined streets in Raleigh North Carolina

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.66%

State median home value: $288,900

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $1,896

14. Wyoming
Aerial View of Downtown Casper, Wyoming at Dusk on Christmas Day

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.57%

State median home value: $309,700

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $1,767

12. (tie) Louisiana
aerial shot of homes and marshland with water and lush green trees in Chalmette Louisiana USA

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.55%

State median home value: $216,500

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $1,180

12. (tie) Arkansas
Fort Smith, Arkansas - November 12th, 2023: Aerial view of Judge Parker's Courthouse and the Fort Smith National Historic Site

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.55%

State median home value: $188,000

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $1,040

11. West Virginia
Aerial View of the Main Street With Shops in Harpers Ferry West Virginia

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.53%

State median home value: $162,600

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $865

10. Utah
Aerial Suburban Neighborhoods and Desert Mountains in Hurricane Utah Fly Over

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.52%

State median home value: $489,400

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $2,525

8. (tie) Delaware
Aerial photo residential upscale homes in Brookside Delaware USA

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.50%

State median home value: $352,000

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $1,768

8. (tie) Tennessee
Beautiful Homes in Tennessee.

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.50%

State median home value: $286,700

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $1,442

7. Idaho
Panoramic of Boise City and residential aerial view of homes with fall colors

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.49%

State median home value: $418,600

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $2,038

4. (tie) Arizona
a neighborhood in northern arizona

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.48%

State median home value: $394,500

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $1,879

4. (tie) Colorado
a neighborhood in northern arizona

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.48%

State median home value: $539,400

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $2,602

4. (tie) South Carolina
Golden sunrise light bathes downtown Charleston, South Carolina, with historic buildings and streets visible from an aerial view.

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.48%

State median home value: $259,000

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $1,251

3. Nevada
Aerial Residential Neighborhood and Community Park in Las Vegas Nevada

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.47%

State median home value: $435,400

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $2,027

2. Alabama
Beautiful aerial photo Downtown Birmingham Alabama USA

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.38%

State median home value: $209,900

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $788

1. Hawaii
Panoramic Aerial view of condo resorts along Wailea beach path in Maui, Hawaii green landscape and coastal areas in Wailea-Makena during golden hour sunset

Effective real estate tax rate: 0.27%

State median home value: $839,100

Annual taxes on a home with a state median value: $2,239

Read the original article on Business Insider

Bryan Johnson says he wants an AI agent between himself and his social media: ‘I never want to see the raw feed’

Bryan Johnson relaxing
Bryan Johnson described social media as “toxic” and suggested AI could filter it.
  • Longevity guru Bryan Johnson likened social media’s impact on mental health to air pollution.
  • Johnson said he’s now doing social media “fasts” for his health.
  • A solution he proposes: using AI to filter harmful content from social media feeds.

Bryan Johnson, fresh off a 40- and 70-hour social media fast, says he’s ready to put an AI buffer between him and his social feed.

In a post on X, the 48-year-old entrepreneur and biohacker compared social media to pollution and water toxins.

“Like other toxins, it accumulates,” he wrote. “You can’t unsee or unfeel what you’ve consumed. It settles into mental tissue like heavy metals, producing chronic low-grade inflammation.”

Eliminating social media entirely isn’t realistic, he wrote.

“‘Just put the phone down’ is as practical as telling someone in 19th-century London to stop breathing coal smoke,” he wrote.

Johnson said time away from the apps is the “only remedy,” but he also suggested that AI agents could serve as an antidote to social media.

“An AI layer between you and the feed. Filtering rage, removing vanity metrics and translating sensationalism into calm, factual language. Preserving signal and eliminating noise,” he wrote.

“I never want to see the raw feed. I want an AI agent to read it for me, strip the engagement metrics that hijack my judgment, filter the rage, and return only what I actually came for,” he added.

In a world where AI agents are already proving to be expert hackers, agreeable coworkers, and custom-built board members — as well as potential security risks — Johnson’s push for an AI layer between himself and his feed doesn’t seem all that far off.

Johnson has made it his life’s focus to try to reverse his biological age to avoid death. He spends around $2 million a year to do so, focusing on extreme treatments such as plasma therapy alongside his strict diet and exercise routine.

His wish for an AI social media buffer also ties into his quest for a longer life, he says: “I want social media to become a longevity intervention, not a longevity threat.”

Read the original article on Business Insider

The lesson from the viral AI post: ‘AI is amazing’ and ‘AI is our doom’ sound like the same thing.

AI apps on a phone
AI is going to change the economy. That’s the point, right?
  • AI could change everything.
  • Of course, “everything” could mean your job. Or if you even have a job.
  • That’s why a new post about AI’s future is so important: It’s the doomsday argument and the pro-AI argument, all at the same time.

You know all that money and effort everyone’s putting into AI because they’re convinced it’s a technology that will change everything? What if they’re right?

That’s a kind of fair summary of a Substack post that went viral over the weekend, and then turned into a Wall Street phenomenon Monday, when lots of tech stocks lost value because of AI fears.

I say “kind of fair” because the “what if” post, published by Citrini Research, isn’t just a “what if” post, but a “if it happens, we’re in big trouble” post.

And now the blowback: AI boosters are calling the Citrini post “AI doomerism” and are poking at some of its doomsday scenarios.

I’m not here to argue whether any of Citrini’s individual points are reasonable — I have no idea how AI will affect the likes of, say, DoorDash.

But this also seems like a forest/trees issue. Maybe the details are wrong, but the big picture should be a sobering one: If the AI future we are being promised comes to pass, it could have a massive effect on our economy, and part of that effect could be meaningful unemployment.

Because that’s not just a wild-eyed anti-AI thesis, but one that’s core to the pro-AI thesis, too. It’s what accounts for the enormous investments tech companies are making in AI, and the crazy valuations we’re seeing for the likes of Anthropic ($380 billion) and OpenAI ($850 billion).

In short: The only way those companies are going to be worth anything close to those numbers* is if they end up having a massive impact. Yes, some of the value may be justified by amazing innovation AI could unlock, like wonder-drugs that get discovered in a fraction of the time. But a lot of the value will come from the fact that AI will let computers do lots of work humans do now.

You can’t have the upside without the downside. Full stop.

It’s easy to imagine all the ways this ripples through our economy. And every couple weeks or so, we get a new impetus to fire up our imaginations. Right now, for instance, the market is trying to get its head around the notion that AI might dramatically cut into the enterprise software industry, which is why we saw companies like IBM plummet on Monday. But you can do the same exercise for all kinds of work, in all kinds of industries: Lawyers. Consultants. Screenwriters. Truckers. Etc.

Nor do you have to be an AI “doomer” to think this way — it’s baked into the pitch of the biggest AI companies. “There are cases where entire classes of jobs will go away,” OpenAI’s Sam Altman said last year. His rival, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, is blunter and more pessimistic, predicting that AI will wipe out half of entry-level white collar jobs and send unemployment skyrocketing.

It is a little weird to see Wall Street whip-sawing as it thinks through how all of this might go. On Tuesday, tech stocks gained again, presumably because investors have now decided they overreacted on Monday. But I won’t be surprised to see the markets lurch again down the line when someone else makes a convincing case that computers will disrupt a different industry.

Maybe Citrini is wrong about DoorDash and right about lawyers. Maybe it’s the other way around. But the general shape of the problem stays the same: The more AI lives up to the hype, the more it will affect the way people work — or if they work at all. You can be optimistic about that prospect, or terrified. But you can’t ignore it.

*Bear in mind these are private companies, which someday expect to be worth much more when they go public.

Read the original article on Business Insider