Skip to main content

Shein acquiring Everlane feels like the end of the millennial sustainable fashion dream

everlane store in new york city
Millennial darling Everlane was bought by Shein.
  • Millennial fashion darling Everlane was acquired by fast-fashion giant Shein.
  • The news surprised loyal customers focused on Everlane’s ethical consumption and quality.
  • It’s just one more nail in the coffin for millennial brands.

When Alex Collins, 35, heard that fast-fashion giant Shein reportedly bought sustainability darling Everlane, she thought it was a late April Fool’s joke.

Collins, a Midwest-based lawyer, has been buying Everlane — a quintessential millennial brand — for over a decade. She recently ordered a haul for a trip to Europe, and is a fan of their jackets, pants, and minimalist aesthetic. To her, Shein — which has been dinged for its working conditions and environmental impact — is a very different beast.

“I’ve never had a good impression of them,” Collins told Business Insider on Monday after Puck News first reported the sale. On Friday, the news became official. In a statement to Business Insider, Alfred Chang, Everlane’s CEO, said that the company had reached an acquisition agreement with Shein.

“Everlane will remain an independent brand, staying true to our longstanding brand values, sustainability commitments, and exceptional quality,” said Chang. “We are entering this next phase with expanded global reach, new capabilities, and greater opportunities to bring our mission and products to more customers around the world.”

Current employees told Business Insider that they learned of the initial news via social media and received no information about the sale until Friday’s confirmation. An internal memo seen by Business Insider said that Chang and the leadership team will remain intact and that “this past week has been a hard one.”

Millennial brands like Everlane, characterized by worker- and environmental-friendly practices and a direct-to-consumer model, have faced a reckoning. Lower prices and trendy values have been subsumed by brands’ long-term business needs, forcing them to raise prices when venture capital runs out or to pivot to AI when times get tough.

Silvia Bellezza, an associate professor of marketing at the Columbia Business School, teaches a course on sustainability and business that uses Everlane as the opening case.

“This was like the darling of the direct-to-consumer business model,” she said. “It’s sad because it means that it’s very difficult for brands to really try to put together fashion at reasonable price levels and sustainably.”

The Everlane Soho store is seen on May 22, 2026 in New York City
The entrance to the Everlane Soho store.

As of 2022, Everlane had taken on $90 million in debt — reportedly one of the reasons the brand was looking for a sale. The sale will also offer an interesting new branding opportunity for Shein.

For “Everlane, the target market perhaps is a little older than Shein, which is typically more like teenagers or consumers in their early 20s,” Bellezza said. “I don’t know. I find it puzzling a little bit. It’d be interesting to see if it is to kind of greenwash their name.”

The end of a millennial-coded sustainable fashion era

On Monday, the tranquil glass box of the Everlane store in downtown Manhattan felt far from the news of a sale. Ambiance-setting candles flickered by registers, and minimalist shelves still boasted cotton and linen apparel. A store associate said they learned about the news of the sale with the rest of the world.

Olivia Lobo, a stay-at-home mother and Gen Z/millennial cusper in Florida, is grappling with what she sees as the loss of her staple brand.

“I care a lot about ethical consumption and the environmental and social impacts of my purchases, but I’m also on a limited budget,” she said.

Lobo, who considers herself a thoughtful consumer, usually ponders most purchases for months and researches clothing companies before pulling the trigger. She loved Everlane because of its ethics and price point. Now, though, she said she won’t be purchasing from them. Instead, she’ll spend more time scouring online resale groups, rather than fast-fashion-filled thrift stores, for higher-quality pieces.

“I don’t love how much time it takes to find items that work for me this way, or the environmental impacts of the shipping involved, but it’s starting to feel like the only way I can realistically get good quality, non-toxic clothes within my budget,” Lobo said.

shoppers leaving the NYC Everlane store
Shoppers (not pictured) were shocked to learn of the Everlane sale.

Darcy, a retiree who’s been shopping at Everlane for the past three or four years, had just bought a couple of tops. She learned about the store through her adult children and enjoys the quality and price of the clothing. She hadn’t heard about the sale; she said she would keep an eye on the brand and that the sale might affect her willingness to shop there. She joked that she was glad she bought her shirts that day.

“I should have bought them yesterday!” Darcy said.

Julia Kupiec, a Xillennial lawyer and artist, said she’d been shopping at the store since around the pandemic. She’s a big fan of their t-shirts and chinos, and thinks that their basics are well-priced. As an embroiderer, she’s always on the hunt for pieces she can embellish, and Everlane can be a good fit for that. Kupiec had not heard news of the sale and said it made her not want to shop the brand anymore.

“I would also be very on the alert for their quality going down,” Kupiec said. “I feel like usually when companies like this merge, their quality goes into the toilet.”

Farah Naguib, a Gen Z shopper, was admiring some of the brand’s flats and loafers in the store with her sister. She thought the quality of the shoes seemed nice and liked the shirts she saw. She also hadn’t heard news of the sale; when I informed the sister duo of the sale, they asked if the brand had been offloaded to private equity. At the news that it was reportedly Shein, they gasped.

“I work in climate sustainability,” Naguib said. “I don’t like fast fashion, which is also why I don’t buy a lot of things. Oh my gosh, that’s so sad.”

Read the original article on Business Insider

I tried Taco Bell’s new Mexican Pizza. It’s even better than the original.

Taco Bell Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza
Taco Bell’s new Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza is a spin on one of its most iconic menu items.
  • Taco Bell released the Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza on Thursday.
  • It’s the first time a new flavor has been available nationwide in the Mexican Pizza’s 41-year history.
  • I thought the new pizza was crispy, delicious, and even better than the original.

Is there a fan base more loyal and dedicated than those who pledge their allegiance to Taco Bell’s Mexican Pizza?

Sure, the Swifties track Taylor’s every Easter egg, and BTS Army has helped the boy band break Guinness World Records, but the Mexican Pizza devotees could still give them a run for their money — especially since they don’t have to spend it on concert tickets.

When Taco Bell removed the Mexican Pizza from its menu in 2020, fans swiftly organized memorials, support groups, and a petition that garnered over 170,000 signatures. Dolly Parton said the chain should bring it back, and Doja Cat wrote a whole rap. Two years later, thanks to their valiant efforts, the Mexican Pizza permanently returned in 2022.

Now, for the first time in its 41-year history, a brand-new flavor is available nationwide.

It can be a dangerous thing to go against such dedicated fans, but I’m prepared to take a stand.

Taco Bell’s new Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza is not only delicious — it’s even better than the original.

Taco Bell is releasing a new Mexican Pizza flavor nationwide for the very first time.
Taco Bell Mexican Pizza

The OG Mexican Pizza includes ground beef and refried beans sandwiched between two tortilla shells, topped with tomatoes, cheese, and pizza sauce.

Its recipe has been tweaked since its 1985 debut — when the pizza still had green peppers and black olives — and variations have been tested in select markets, but this is the first time fans across the US will be able to get their hands on a brand-new flavor of Mexican Pizza.

And this time, it’s all about the chicken.

The Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza fuses two of Taco Bell’s most popular menu items.
Taco Bell Cantina Chicken Menu

The Mexican Pizza may have had its own musical, but Taco Bell’s Cantina Chicken has also made a name for itself since debuting on the chain’s menu in 2024.

Available in a taco, burrito, or quesadilla, the chicken — slow-roasted with garlic, onions, and various chiles — was a hit, especially with Gen Z. Melding it with Taco Bell’s most famous dish felt like the natural next step.

“The Mexican Pizza is iconic for a reason,” said Liz Matthews, Taco Bell’s global chief food innovation officer. “We didn’t want to reinvent it; we wanted to build on it.”

Taco Bell is also capitalizing on Gen Z’s love of sauce. Every Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza will come with the chain’s new Jalapeño Citrus Salsa, designed to complement the Cantina Chicken menu.

The Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza comes loaded with colorful ingredients.
Taco Bell's Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza

The new pizza — which hit menus on Thursday and will be available for a limited time — features the same crispy tortilla shells as its predecessor, but everything else is different. It’s made with the Cantina Chicken, plus black beans, green chile sauce, and a three-cheese blend.

Shredded purple cabbage and pico de gallo, two ingredients that were introduced with the Cantina Chicken menu, are sprinkled on top.

Adding some safety-cone-orange flair is the Jalapeño Citrus Salsa, made with red jalapeños and guajillo chiles. Each Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza also comes with a packet of Taco Bell’s lime-green Avocado Verde Salsa, introduced with the Cantina Chicken menu and made with green chili peppers, tomatillos, and real avocado pulp.

I topped my pizza with both salsas and took a bite of my first slice.
A slice of Taco Bell's Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza

I was already a big fan of the Cantina Chicken menu, and I think the Mexican Pizza is a perfect vehicle for it. The combination of chicken with purple cabbage and pico de gallo adds a burst of freshness you don’t typically find in Taco Bell’s beef dishes, and the green chile sauce adds tangy depth to each bite.

I was surprised by how much I liked the tortilla shell, which was so satisfyingly crisp — even with so many ingredients on top, it still retained its crunch.

The pizza tasted great with both salsas on top, although I wish the Jalapeño Citrus had just a bit more punch. The flavor was pretty subtle despite the name, but I liked how it lingered on the tongue.

Still, I finished the entire pizza despite testing three other Taco Bell menu items that day — clearly, I was loving it.

I think the Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza is a great upgrade of the original.
Taco Bell Mexican Pizza

Obviously, the Mexican Pizza is iconic for a reason, and I liked it when I tried it for the first time in May 2022, but the refried beans can be overpowering, and there’s never enough pizza sauce. Whenever the Taco Bell cravings hit, I still reached for my usual burrito or Crunchwrap Supreme.

But I will definitely order the Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza again. It’s light and crispy, with a nacho-esque texture that I really enjoyed. You could order it for lunch, on a road trip, or at 2 a.m. The veggies keep it fresh, while the sauce and crunch still make it feel fun and indulgent.

The Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza is my favorite new Taco Bell item this year.
Taco Bell Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza with new orange salsa on top

When I interviewed Taylor Montgomery, Taco Bell’s global chief brand officer, at the chain’s first superfan convention back in 2024, he told me that the Mexican Pizza’s return helped “reawaken people’s love for the brand.”

“I think there’s just so much nostalgia with that product,” he said. “It’s kind of like the gateway to Taco Bell was the Mexican Pizza.”

As always, Taco Bell is really paying attention to its fans. In addition to the Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza, this year they’ll be getting Mexican Pizza Empanadas and Strawberry and Cream Mexican Pizza Bites. These ideas are all fun, unexpected, and a little kooky, which is exactly how I’d describe Taco Bell at its best.

Now we just need to send a Cantina Chicken Mexican Pizza to Dolly.

Read the original article on Business Insider

A professor who helped write UC Berkeley’s strict new AI policy says it’s about preserving ‘the value add of a lawyer’

Students walk past UC Berkeley's former Boalt Hall in Berkeley, California.
The University of California, Berkeley Law School is implementing a stricter AI policy.
  • UC Berkeley Law School is implementing a stricter AI policy.
  • The general policy is that students can no longer use AI for activities such as brainstorming.
  • UC Berkeley Law School professor Chris Hoofnagle said it’s about making sure students learn fundamental skills.

UC Berkeley Law School’s stricter AI policy forbids students from using it for things like brainstorming, but a professor who helped write the new rules says the school doesn’t want to outright ban the tech.

“Our policy is about developing students with the fundamental skills required for AI lawyering,” UC Berkeley Law School professor Chris Hoofnagle told Business Insider.

Hoofnagle said the school recognized that its 2023 AI use policy was “too liberal” in allowing students to use AI, especially given advancements in generative AI models since then.

“It can, in effect, write a research paper soup to nuts,” Hoofnagle said. “So, the increasing capability of LLMs required us to rethink students’ reliance on them.”

UC Berkeley Law Professor Chris Hoofnagle
UC Berkeley Law Professor Chris Hoofnagle helped develop the new policy.

UC Berkeley Law School’s new policy, which will go into effect this summer, does not allow students to use AI for conceptualizing, outlining, drafting, revising, editing, translating, or for any purpose in an exam situation. The 2023 policy allowed for AI use for brainstorming, such as asking a chatbot to help come up with a paper topic, and conceptualization.

Hoofnagle said the new policy was approved by a faculty vote, though instructors can deviate from it. He also said particular AI-focused courses will follow different standards.

The goal, Hoofnagle said, is to ensure that first-year law students are learning the fundamentals of being a lawyer, including “how to read a case, analyze a case, and write about it cogently.”

“Of course, the question becomes, what is the value add of the lawyer?” he said. “And if that lawyer cannot use their own analytical judgment to assess an AI output, that lawyer has very little value. And so, this is what our policy is about.”

Overall, Hoofnagle said the expectation and demand from law firms is that students graduate with a proficiency in using AI.

“Students are asking for these courses, and they’re learning during their summers that law firms already extensively use AI,” he said.

Startups like Harvey and Legora are fiercely competing for the estimated $1 trillion global legal market. Harvey has sought to expand its presence by offering free access to law schools. Stanford Law School, which Hoofnagle said had a stricter AI policy when Berkeley rolled out its initial one in 2023, is part of Harvey’s law school alliance program.

Hoofnagle concedes the policy has loopholes. After all, policing AI is becoming a Sisyphean task in a world where search engines are adding AI overlays to ensure their continued relevance. He said that even standard searches on Lexis and Westlaw now have an LLM-generated summary.

“There is no kind of clean answer for it,” he said, adding, the school “obviously can’t ban search.”

Schools are trying to keep up

Law schools and undergraduate universities are alike in trying to stay ahead of the wave of AI advancements and the challenges that accompany them.

Princeton recently announced the most significant change to its honor code in 133 years, The Daily Princetonian reported. As of July 1, all in-person examinations will be proctored. The advent of AI was cited as one of the reasons for the change.

Hoofnagle said that Berkeley law has seen an “uptick” in misconduct cases and has converted more take-home exams to in-person as a result. The in-person exams are conducted on a computer with specialized software that prevents access to the internet and the use of copy-and-paste functions. Despite the precautions, he said it is still possible to cheat.

“You can’t protect against everything in the world, but there’s a really strong signal that if you cut corners, ultimately the student will pay for it when they have to take an in-person exam,” he said.

Read the original article on Business Insider

I’m a trained chef. Here are the 6 mistakes I see home cooks make that sabotage their meals.

Photo of hand slicing a tomato on a wooden cutting board
I’ve learned that most missteps happen during small moments during the cooking process.
  • As a trained chef, I believe the key to cooking a great meal is following the kitchen basics.
  • Resting protein at room temperature before and after cooking it improves the texture and flavor.
  • Without properly preheating a pan or oven, a dish is doomed before it ever hits heat.

Most cooking disasters don’t result from botching fancy techniques, and I say that as someone who graduated from a top Parisian culinary institute and has over 30 years of professional cooking experience.

In truth, it’s small, inconspicuous habits that sabotage most dishes.

I believe that excellent cooking isn’t about mastering complicated techniques or buying expensive ingredients. It’s about paying attention to kitchen fundamentals and respecting the cooking process.

Fixing these common missteps, which I see repeatedly from cooks of all levels, can make a noticeable difference in foods’ flavor and texture.

Applying heat to protein too soon can cause it to cook unevenly.
piece of raw uncooked salmon
I remove my salmon from the refrigerator at least 15 minutes before I cook it.

Taking protein straight from the refrigerator and throwing it into a hot pan is one of the fastest ways to cook it unevenly. The exterior cooks at a faster rate than the interior, so it’s overdone by the time the center is cooked.

I let meat or fish sit at room temperature before I cook it for a more even result. Exact timing depends on the protein — fish fillets usually only need 15 minutes, whereas thick pieces of chicken breasts, pork chops, or steaks benefit from 30 minutes to an hour on the counter.

I stick to this rule regardless of whether I cook the protein in my sauté pan, griddle, or grill. It’s become somewhat second nature.

Whenever I make a thick ribeye steak or a side of salmon for guests, I make a mental note to start the cooking process by pulling the meat or fish out of the refrigerator before prepping everything else.

Salting fish or meat before it reaches room temperature can mess with its texture.
salt bucket with onion and carrots in background
Adding salt too early can mess up your protein’s texture.

I wait to season my protein until it’s had a chance to sit at room temperature, especially if I use salt.

If I salt steaks or fish too early, for example, it can draw moisture to the surface and interfere with browning.

I let the protein lose its chill first, pat it dry, and then season it right before it hits the pan, grill, or oven for optimal sear and texture.

A pan that isn’t properly preheated won’t sear food.
thermometer pointed at pan
For a solid sear, make sure your pan is hot enough.

This tip is a practice in patience. A pan that isn’t fully preheated will slowly cook your food into a pale, sad version of what it could be, and the same goes for an oven that hasn’t reached temperature.

Preheating isn’t a suggestion — it’s part of the cooking process. An under-heated pan won’t sear your food, but an overheated pan can burn the outside of food before the inside has time to cook, especially with delicate proteins like fish.

I like to give my pan a couple of minutes over medium-high heat before adding oil, keeping close tabs on the pan’s temperature using a laser thermometer gun.

If I’m cooking with my oven, I wait until it’s reached the desired temperature — which I check with an oven thermometer — rather than when it beeps.

Chopping, slicing, and dicing with dull knives can ruin the entire cooking process.
sharpening knife
I sharpen my knife once per year.

A dull knife does a cook no favors. It crushes herbs instead of slicing them, tears through proteins, and makes even simple prep feel like a chore. It can also be dangerous, as it requires more force and can easily lead to a loss of control.

A sharp knife glides, creates clean cuts, and makes everything from chopping onions to slicing steak faster and more precise. It’s a nonnegotiable in every kitchen, and I always recommend cooks invest in a knife sharpener.

If cared for properly, a good knife should last a long time. I’ve used the same ones in my home kitchen for years because I diligently maintain them.

Using a honing steel regularly helps keep the edge aligned so the knife stays sharp for longer. That said, most recreational home cooks only need to sharpen a quality chef’s knife once a year.

Waiting to taste food until after it’s fully cooked makes some mistakes irreversible.
Spoon in pot of beans
When I cook something like a stew, I taste it four or five times before it even reaches the table.

I taste my food throughout the cooking process, as I build seasoning over time.

Once it touches my tongue, I know whether the dish needs salt, acid, or balance before it’s too late to adjust. Once it’s already reduced, thickened, or finished cooking, it’s harder to make adjustments.

For example, if I realize a soup or pasta sauce lacks seasoning once it’s done, adding more salt might help, but the flavor might taste flat since the seasoning didn’t fully cook in the dish.

I usually taste my dishes at every step that alters the flavor — after seasoning, reducing, adding acid, or combining the ingredients — to maintain control over the final result.

Cutting into protein too soon after cooking is one of the most overlooked errors.
sliced steak on plate next to salad with tomato slices
Although it’s tempting to cut into meat right after it cooks, doing so releases valuable flavor.

Few things irk me more than seeing someone slice into a beautiful piece of chicken, steak, or fish too soon. When I watch all the juices run out onto the cutting board, all I see is lost flavor.

Meat continues cooking even after you remove it from heat. Called carryover cooking, it happens because the residual heat from the outside continues moving inward as the protein rests.

For example, a steak I take off the grill at 130 degrees Fahrenheit can climb to 135 degrees Fahrenheit within a few minutes of resting at room temperature.

I remove meats from the heat source when they’re a few degrees shy of my desired temperature, as the carryover heat can raise the internal temperature.

When a protein rests, it allows the juices to redistribute and the carryover heat to gently finish cooking it. Skipping this step can cause dry out even perfectly cooked meat.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Read the AI executive order Trump didn’t sign

President Donald Trump holds up an executive order in the Oval Office.
President Donald Trump holds up an executive order in the Oval Office.
  • President Donald Trump was expected to sign an executive order on AI oversight this week, but the event was postponed.
  • “I didn’t like certain aspects of it,” Trump said, adding that he worried the order might slow US efforts to beat China in AI.
  • A draft of the unsigned executive order, obtained by POLITICO, emphasizes that government AI reviews would be voluntary.

POLITICO has obtained a draft of the executive order on artificial intelligence that President Donald Trump had been expected to sign Thursday afternoon, only to abruptly postpone the event.

The document — available here — was meant to address concerns that advanced AI products from companies such as Anthropic could unleash devastating cyberattacks and wreak other havoc if they fell into the wrong hands. It called for creating a voluntary oversight system in which developers of advanced AI models could submit their products to a review by federal agencies as much as 90 days before releasing them, POLITICO previously reported.

Among other details, the seven-page draft emphasizes that the government AI reviews would be voluntary: “Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the creation of a mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting requirement for the development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models, including frontier models.”

Despite such assurances, former Trump AI czar David Sacks raised concerns that the voluntary reviews may one day become mandatory, a senior White House official told POLITICO on Thursday.

The draft also includes language aimed at bad actors. It directs the attorney general to enforce the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and “other applicable Federal criminal laws against anyone who utilizes AI to illegally access or damage a computer without authorization, or who utilizes AI while engaged in such illegal access to further any other crime.”

Administration officials had briefed major tech companies about the order’s contents this week, and top AI industry executives had been invited to attend a Thursday signing ceremony at the White House.

But Trump told reporters he hit the brakes.

“I didn’t like certain aspects of it,” the president said, adding that he worried the order might slow U.S. efforts to beat China in the race to dominate AI.

The administration has not said what changes might be made in the order or when the signing might be rescheduled.

Jacob Wendler contributed to this report.

This story originally ran in POLITICO and appears on Business Insider through the Axel Springer Global Reporters Network. The network publishes major stories from the Axel Springer network of publications, a worldwide group of news outlets that includes Business Insider.

Read the original article on Business Insider

My parents rarely praised me. I didn’t realize I repeated the pattern with my own kids.

Man graduating
The author is so proud of all her children, but realizes she wasn’t telling them.
  • I often praised my children to others instead of to them directly.
  • My upbringing made it hard for me to express encouragement openly.
  • A painful conversation with my son changed how I parent adult kids.

Several years ago, while driving behind a car with a “my-child-is-an-honor-student” bumper sticker, I said to my oldest son, sitting in the passenger seat, “I always wanted one of those.”

He, then a college student, replied, “Why? It doesn’t mean anything.”

He was right. In the greater scheme of things, achieving honor roll in elementary or middle school is not a significant accomplishment. Nor is it a predictor of future success. Even so, I still wanted one!

None of my five children was an academic superstar. They rarely achieved honor roll for more than one quarter of any school year, and none was named to the Dean’s List in college. Nevertheless, I’ve always been exceedingly proud of each one. In fact, I’m constantly singing their praises to anyone who’ll listen.

The problem is, I rarely commend them directly.

My parents did not praise me

Maybe that’s because my parents were not generous with praise. Their generation was not hardwired for affirmation, so I did not learn from experience how formative praise is.

I was a well-behaved kid, a decent student, and a pretty compliant daughter. I didn’t need positive reinforcement to motivate me, although it would have been nice to receive some occasionally.

Growing up in the mid-20th century, the expectation for most girls like me was to earn an MRS, not an MBA. So, when in my senior year of high school, I was accepted into all five colleges I applied to, my parents were not over the moon with excitement.

The day the fifth acceptance letter arrived from my first-choice school, I couldn’t wait to share the news with my dad. I’d hoped he’d be as happy as I was. If he was, he didn’t show it, and to this day, I still feel disappointed that he didn’t give me a big hug and tell me he was proud.

It shouldn’t be so hard to say ‘well done’

I was effusive with praise when my kids were small. We celebrated each milestone from learning to use the toilet to tying their shoes to riding a bike. But as they’ve grown, I’ve been a much quieter cheerleader.

The year my third son’s Little League team won the championship I consoled him when he struck out but did not high-five him for hitting the line drive that clinched the series. When another son sang a solo during a school concert that was so beautiful it silenced the audience, I was too stunned to tell him he’d done an amazing job.

Now that they’re adults, each of my children is achieving great things. One’s an artist in high demand. Another’s a photographer whose work is published internationally. My youngest son, a UX designer, was recruited by a top tech company halfway through his junior year of college. My second son, who works in finance, created a unique investment vehicle that has launched his career into the stratosphere.

Each of their successes is extraordinary, which is all the more reason I should tell them I’m proud.

My kids want to know I’m proud of them

Of course, I’m more than willing to tell friends, colleagues, and even mere acquaintances about all my kids accomplish. I post to Zoom chats and populate Slack channels with proud mama moments all the time. I share links to the Google alerts I’ve set up and forward their Reels from Instagram. I’m constantly sending photos in group chats, but I rarely send them texts to say how thrilled I am for them.

I’m trying to figure out why I’m so reluctant. Maybe it’s because I’m overwhelmed by their success. Where did the talent come from? Certainly not from me. Regardless, as their mother, I should congratulate them for all they’re doing.

I didn’t realize just how important that is until my third son confronted me with an email I’d written years before about a photo essay he’d published. Instead of complimenting his work, I critiqued the composition. He was devastated by my comments. He’d worked hard on the project and had hoped I would recognize its value. Instead, I wrote about its flaws.

When he read my words back to me, I was shocked. Not only did I not remember writing them, but I also had a hard time figuring out why I was so negative. I was ashamed I’d hurt him. At that moment, I realized no matter their age, my kids want my praise. Since then, I’ve been working really hard to tell each one just how proud of them I truly am.

They’re extraordinary people, and they should hear that often from their mother.

Read the original article on Business Insider