Author: admin

• Meta told staff on Thursday that it planned to eliminate 10% of its workforce.
• Inside the company, employees are bracing for weeks of limbo as they wait to find out who will be cut.
• Meta employees responded internally with a mixture of questions, concerns, and jokes.

Welcome to “28 days of hell.”

That’s how one Meta employee characterized the tech giant’s announcement that thousands of jobs will be cut on May 20. Employees flooded internal forums with similar posts, many of which were filled with anxiety, dark humor, and questions as they wait to learn who will be out of a job.

“How are you motivating yourself to work for the next 1 month with layoffs confirmed?” one person posted on the anonymous workplace app Blind, in a section just for Meta employees.

Someone else replied, “I’m motivating myself to do stuff that I can put on my resume for my next job lol.”

In a memo sent to staff on Thursday, Meta said it shared some layoff details earlier than usual because the news had already leaked. The company plans to cut around 10% of employees next month and close 6,000 open roles.

“I know this leaves everyone with nearly a month of ambiguity, which is incredibly unsettling,” wrote Meta’s chief people officer Janelle Gale.

For some Meta employees, the fact that company leadership acknowledged layoffs brought some relief. The layoffs had been so widely discussed internally that the announcement helped ease some uncertainty, according to one employee who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter.

One of the top comments under Gale’s internal Meta post was a picture of an elephant, a reference to leadership addressing the elephant in the room. Reuters first reported Meta was planning sweeping layoffs in March, and employees have been speculating on the extent of the cuts in the weeks since.

“elephant addressed!” commented another employee. Another posted a picture of an envelope that read: “Addressed to: “ELEPHANT.”

Others said that having to wait almost a month to find out who would be affected created anxiety. One person posted that this was their first week at the company. “It might be goodbye for me,” they wrote.

Another employee, who requested anonymity due to sensitivity, told Business Insider that the announcement added pressure for them to deliver results over the next month because it’s unknown which teams will be affected by the cuts.

“I’m a little stressed about making impact in the next month,” they said.

Despite a sense of added pressure, it’s not the employee’s first go-around with cuts at the company. The worker said they’re going to continue working as usual, assuming the worst while trying to make the most of the next month as they wait for further updates.

“I assume I’m always two months away from being laid off, no matter what leadership says, so I’m going to continue to operate as usual,” the employee said.

Employees also commented on Gale’s internal post with questions.

One person asked if Meta staff would receive their August 15 stock payouts, which are part of some employees’ compensation packages. Gale said that impacted employees would have a termination date prior to the August vest and would therefore not receive it.

“Because of the timing of the notifications, we will have just had the May 15 vest. There are some instances, based on work location, where people will remain employed through the August 15 vest,” Gale wrote. Another employee thanked Gale for the clarification.

Another employee asked if travel would be restricted the week of May 20. “We are not restricting travel company-wide. VPs will share team-specific guidance,” Gale responded.

‘I feel more anxious about surviving’

On the Meta employee section of Blind, some users asked why Meta couldn’t offer voluntary buyouts. Microsoft on Thursday offered one-time early retirement buyouts to thousands of its long-time employees, and Google has extended the same offers to staff across some orgs.

Many posts were from users asking others for information about which groups might be affected.

In a longer post, one user said the downside might be surviving the cuts.

“I feel more anxious about surviving this layoff,” they wrote, recalling several rounds of layoffs at the company since 2022.

“Because we all know it’s just gonna get worse for those of us who are left behind and have to absorb even more work, amongst other declining factors in this sad fearful company,” they wrote.

• Over the last decade, matcha has gained popularity in the US.
• Now, most major coffee chains across the US offer their own version of a matcha latte.
• I tried matcha lattes from Dunkin’, Starbucks, and Tim Hortons, and one got the flavor just right.

Move over iced coffee — my preferred drink for quenching my thirst on a hot day is iced matcha.

Matcha, a type of powdered green tea, has steadily been gaining popularity in the West after being a staple in Japan for centuries. In fact, it’s become so popular so quickly on TikTok that the country has experienced shortages.

With the rise of matcha and its health benefits (it’s high in antioxidants, making it a superfood, and can bolster immunity and help with inflammation), it’s no wonder that some of the most popular coffee chains in the US have hopped on the matcha train.

Starbucks has had matcha on the menu since 2006, but the chain has acknowledged that 20 years later, “matcha is having a moment.” Dunkin’ and Tim Hortons embraced matcha much more recently, adding it to their menus in 2020.

Matcha, to me, seems like the perfect springtime drink. So, to celebrate the end of what seemed like the longest winter on record, I tried the iced matcha lattes at Starbucks, Dunkin’, and Tim Hortons.

Here’s what I thought.

My first stop was Starbucks, which I was surprised to see had an entire collection “inspired by matcha.”

The sign read, “We love it as much as you do. It’s why we made this collection that captures matcha’s unique vibrancy and energy.”

I was particularly fond of the mug on the far left, with the paint splatters, and the mug second from the right.

We were off to a strong start, but the good vibes didn’t last long.

I was already dubious before taking a sip, after noticing how separated the latte was.

A grande iced matcha latte at my local Starbucks costs $6.25 for 16 fluid ounces.

I only needed to take one sip to know something did not taste right to me.

Matcha, a type of green tea, is not sweet — it’s bitter. So I usually add a little bit of sweetener to it (most frequently a pump of vanilla).

Starbucks adds, by default, three pumps of classic syrup to a matcha latte, so if I added more syrup, it could be disgustingly sweet.

However, this drink was so bitter that I had to double-check that the syrup had been added. It had — I just couldn’t handle it, I guess.

It looked good, but overall it wasn’t for me.

This drink looked thick and creamy, precisely what I would want, but it ended up being a bit more watery than I thought.

Ultimately, it felt like I was drinking bitter, watery green tea. The chain uses unsweetened powder, which I think threw me off.

Starbucks confirmed that in January 2025, it switched from sweetened matcha powder to an unsweetened one to give customers more customization options.

Once I shook it up and stopped drinking from the straw, the latte got better, but it still wasn’t for me.

Of the three chains I visited, Starbucks easily had the most options to customize its drinks, and it has the most expansive matcha menu, with 16 different types, including Dubai chocolate, banana bread, and lavender cream. Clearly, the chain is responding to customer demand for its matcha.

In the future, I think I would add vanilla syrup or try another flavor combination to reach my preferred level of sweetness. But as it stands, I didn’t love the basic option.

Onto the next!

If Starbucks was too bitter, Dunkin’ was on the opposite end of the spectrum.

A medium matcha latte from Dunkin’ set me back $5.49, so it was slightly cheaper than Starbucks and came in a larger size at 24 fluid ounces.

However, it really just tasted like matcha-flavored milk to me.

Both Starbucks and Dunkin’ use three scoops of matcha powder in their standard drinks, but while Starbucks uses syrup to sweeten it, Dunkin’ uses cane sugar.

The drink was on the thinner side.

This didn’t taste bad, but if I was really craving the earthy taste of matcha, I wouldn’t go back to Dunkin’.

That said, I would recommend this to someone who has never had matcha before and is looking to ease into it. They’ll be shopping for the ceremonial grade stuff in no time.

Dunkin’ did not respond to a request for comment regarding its matcha recipe or use of sweeteners.

To my surprise, my favorite matcha latte came from Tim Hortons.

This cost $5.27 for 16 fluid ounces, placing it in the middle of the three in terms of cost per fluid ounce.

Tim Hortons uses a sweetened matcha powder, which I think made all the difference. They don’t add any additional sweeteners, so this struck the perfect balance of being slightly sweet, not too milky, and still having that earthy flavor.

Tim Hortons did not respond to a request for comment regarding its matcha recipe.

I felt like Goldilocks sipping this.

Not too sweet, not too bitter, a reasonable price — what more could I ask for?

I was also into the little maple leaf Tim Hortons puts on its cups. Thank you, Canada!

Sadly, there’s only one Tim’s in all of Manhattan (in addition to two in Brooklyn and four in Staten Island). The Midtown location isn’t the most convenient from my apartment or office, so I don’t think I’ll be able to add it to the rotation.

I really enjoyed the Timbits I ordered with my drink, too.

Please expand, Tim Hortons! I’ll become a dedicated Horton Head and drink matcha every day if one were closer.

• Lionsgate chairman Adam Fogelson said it’s important to tell Michael Jackson’s story authentically.
• He said he would support a “Michael” sequel that examines Jackson’s child sexual-abuse allegations.
• “Michael” originally dramatized allegations from 13-year-old Jordan Chandler, but the storyline was cut.

Though “Michael” doesn’t examine the darker chapters of Michael Jackson’s life, that doesn’t mean a potential sequel won’t.

The biopic on the King of Pop, which premieres in theaters on April 24, has had a complicated journey to screen. Its release was delayed several times: first due to the 2023 strikes, and then due to reshoots that were required after the filmmakers learned some scenes violated the terms of a $20 million settlement with the family of then-13-year-old Jordan Chandler, who accused Jackson of sexual abuse in 1993.

Jackson and his estate have consistently denied all allegations.

As a result of the reshoots, the movie’s framing and scope changed. Now, “Michael” largely focuses on Jackson’s meteoric rise to superstardom, starting with the Jackson 5 and ending when Jackson (played by his real-life nephew Jaafar Jackson) is about to start making his hit solo album, “Bad.” The only abuse examined in the movie is scenes that depict Jackson’s father, Joe (Colman Domingo), whipping him when he was a child.

Since the film now covers only a portion of what the original movie would have, a potential sequel seems on the table: Not for nothing, the movie ends with a title card that reads, “His Story Continues.”

A potential part two of “Michael” could spotlight not just more of Jackson’s career highlights, but the superstar’s fall from grace, which came in the form of child sexual abuse allegations and a 2005 criminal trial involving another child, Gavin Arvizo.

Jackson was acquitted on all counts after a highly publicized three month trial. He died in 2009 of acute propofol intoxication after his personal physician administered the sedative.

Do the allegations against Jackson need to be addressed in a potential sequel to tell the full story of Michael Jackson?

Lionsgate Motion Picture Group chairman Adam Fogelson supports it if director Antione Fuqua and writer John Logan decide to go down that road.

“From my perspective, it’s important to try to give the audience an authentic understanding of who Michael Jackson was,” Fogelson told Business Insider. “So I think that can be done with or without some of what was in the third act that had to be scrapped.”

“Michael,” which was made with the support of Jackson’s estate, initially depicted the police raid of Jackson’s Neverland Ranch following allegations of sexual abuse by 13-year-old Jordan Chandler. The filmmakers discovered after shooting that there was a clause in Chandler’s settlement barring any depiction of his case in a movie. According to Variety, reshoots cost the Jackson estate around $15 million, as the Neverland Ranch raid had bookended the original film.

“There has been so much energy and ink with people speculating,” Fogelson continued. “Speaking for myself, I think when you watch this movie you are given a window into the extraordinarily unusual circumstances that impacted Michael Jackson from a very young age. This movie isn’t afraid to reflect the wildly unusual circumstances of his life. But we believe more story can and hopefully will be told, and that’s going to come down to not only the performance of the film but the audience telling us they want more, and we believe based on the response we’ve gotten that’s what they are going to say.”

Despite the movie currently holding a 38% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, “Michael” seems to be critic-proof. The film is tracking to earn north of $100 million at the worldwide box office in its opening weekend, including $70 million-plus domestically, which would best past hit music biopics like “Bohemian Rhapsody” and “Straight Outta Compton.”

• “Sinceerly” is a Chrome plugin that rewrites your perfectly worded emails to add typos.
• You can select “Subtle,” “Human,” or “CEO” modes for maximum brevity and typos.
• In a time when AI writing is common, typos are a status symbol showing you hand-wrote an email (or not).

Not so long ago, writing an email with perfect grammar and spelling was a sign of professionalism, thoughtfulness and care, of education and intelligence, of a sharp and agile mind.

Now, it just means we assume you’re a lazy jerk who used ChatGPT or some other AI tool.

The pendulum has finally swung, and after several centuries of the English language, good writing in private communication is no longer a prized thing. Now we are entering a terrifying and chaotic period in which typos are good, and all-lower-case missives connote power.

The era of keyboard chaos is upon us.

Typos are increasingly a status symbol showing you hand-crafted an email instead of using AI. If your email is too perfect, it might scream “AI!” So, of course, there’s an AI tool that adds typos back into your AI-written emails.

Sinceerly is a Chrome plugin created by Ben Horwitz that will rewrite your emails to add back mistakes, making them look more human.

There are three modes:

“Subtle,” which will streamline the text by knocking out filler words and turning things into contractions when it can. Then there’s “Human,” which adds an even more conversational tone — both Subtle and Human typically add a typo in the first sentence.

Here is a sample email I wrote to my boss to tell him about my lunch plan:

Here’s that same email, turned into “CEO” mode:

And finally, there’s “CEO,” which goes all lowercase and injects intense brevity. If there’s no signature in your email, sometimes it adds a “sent from my iPhone” (lol).

CEOs indeed do have a really specific email style that is often very fast in response time and short, which can reflect the power differential between the boss and the person they’re corresponding with.

Horwitz, who is about to graduate from Harvard Business School in May, told me he made Sinceerly using Claude and was inspired by his own experience.

“I am a terrible typist, naturally, and lightly dyslexic,” he said. “It would take me so long in my first job straight out of college to write emails and make sure there were no typos and everything. When Grammarly came around, it was like, ‘Oh, OK, this is pretty good for me.’ But now my email inbox is filled with AI slop.”

Horwitz told me he made the plugin just for fun, as a goof, and doesn’t necessarily expect a lot of people to pay for it (after a few free test runs, it asks you to pay $4.99 to keep using it). Horwitz isn’t really in it for the money; he likes making playful pranks about business life (he previously made a collection of stitched baseball hats you could buy with titles like “product,” “engineering,” and “gtm” for founders who, uh, wear a lot of hats).

I don’t think the ink is yet dry on the status of typos in emails; AI in digital communication is still so new, and the norms around it are still evolving.

As a terrible typist myself, I am pro-typo and believe that we should let our messy human fingers speak for us. If we’re asking someone to take the time to read our emails, we should take the time to write them — even if that includes a few mistakes.

• Instagram launched a new app in Italy and Spain this week called “Instants.”
• A hodgepodge of apps like Snapchat, Locket, and BeReal, the app is meant to be “low-pressure.”
• Meta did not share more details about its plans to roll out the app in the US.

Meta is welcoming a new app to the family.

Instagram launched a new app called “Instants” in Italy and Spain on Thursday, but it’s not live elsewhere yet, a Meta spokesperson confirmed to Business Insider.

Instants lets users share disappearing photos with their friends. These photos last 24 hours and can’t be viewed more than once. The app’s slogan, per the current app listing: “Real life, real quick.”

The app sounds like a Frankenstein of social apps like Locket, BeReal, and, of course, Snapchat.

The app is intended to “give people low-pressure ways to connect with friends,” the spokesperson added.

Users can take photos (or short videos) with the app’s camera and add text, but cannot edit the content further. They can then share that content with a limited audience, specifically mutual followers and close friends.

“We’re exploring multiple versions of Instants to see what people like, and will listen to our community,” the spokesperson said.

Expanding Meta’s portfolio of social apps has become commonplace for the tech giant. Instagram has Threads and Edits under its umbrella, and Meta also has the AI-focused Meta AI app.

Meta did not share when, or whether, the company will roll out the Instants app in the US.

Have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at sbradley@businessinsider.com or Signal at sydneykbradley.123. Use a personal email address, a nonwork WiFi network, and a nonwork device; here’s our guide to sharing information securely.

• Up to 7% of Microsoft’s US workforce, or about 8,750 people, could qualify for voluntary buyouts.
• Microsoft says the program is about giving people more options if they want to retire.
• The buyouts provide a way to trim its workforce without needing to conduct layoffs.

Microsoft is offering one-time buyouts to long-serving employees in the US, according to an email obtained by Business Insider.

The move could affect up to 7% of its US workforce of 125,000 people, or about 8,750 people, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The tech giant says it’ll provide buyouts to people who want to retire and whose years of service, plus their age, add up to 70 or more. For example, a 58-year-old who has worked 12 years at Microsoft would qualify.

That amounts to “a small percentage of our US employees,” Microsoft’s chief people officer Amy Coleman wrote in the email. The program excludes some very high-ranking employees and some who work in sales.

The buyouts allow the company to trim its workforce without needing to conduct high-profile layoffs. Microsoft has undergone several rounds of layoffs in recent years.

Tech companies are under pressure to reduce their head count because of AI. The fintech company Block cut 40% of its entire workforce in February, citing AI. Meta is also laying off 10% of its staff next month.

Microsoft’s email did not mention AI, saying that the company is offering more options for people who may want to retire.

Microsoft is also overhauling its pay and rewards system to better recognize high performers and make expectations clearer, the email said. The company is moving away from tying stock awards to bonuses, giving managers more flexibility to reward top staff.

Microsoft has been pouring billions into AI to compete with other tech giants like Google and is set to spend close to $100 billion in capital expenditures this year, according to a Business Insider analysis.

Microsoft declined to comment.