New online cryptocurrency casinos september 2026

  1. Best Independent Bingo Sites 2026 Win Real Cash: I might just be playing the game.
  2. Deposit 10 Get 100 Free Spins No Wagering 2026 Play and Win - There are some cool features like auto play and customization that allows users to change lobby scenes and other features.
  3. Best £5 Deposit Casino 2026 No-nonsense Reviews: The report also claimed that banning football gambling sponsorships would lead to major revenue loss across the entire football industry.

Best free spin crypto casino

Best Chat Bingo Sites UK 2026 Deposit and Play
The selection of games can be filtered by many factors, which we particularly liked.
Best Live Slots UK 2026 Trusted Picks
Just visit the website of the brand, find the Register Now button, click on the button, and proceed to a new page.
It's one of the few sites that seem to cater more to loyal players than new ones, and that's always a good sign.

Online blackjack calculator

Free Spins No Deposit or Wagering 2026 Grab Your Free Bonus
A fully trained card counter then had to undergo a trial by fire final exam by playing through 8 six-deck shoes without mistakes, all while being lambasted with loud noises, music and other distractions typical to the average casino.
Best Paysafecard Casino UK 2026 Real Money Ready
Several free spins bonuses in a row are prohibited, as well as several multiple accounts.
Skrill Casino No Deposit Bonus UK 2026 Secure and Licensed

Skip to main content

Meta used AI workplace tools to target employees on medical leave, lawsuit alleges

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
  • Twenty-six employees sued Meta, saying it used AI systems to help select workers for layoffs.
  • The lawsuit says AI usage metrics penalized workers who took medical, parental, or disability leave.
  • A Meta spokesperson said that the “claims lack merit and are not based on facts.”

Meta used AI-powered workplace systems to penalize employees for taking medical and parental leave and then selected them for layoffs, according to allegations in a new lawsuit.

The complaint, filed by 26 current and former workers on Monday in federal court in Northern California, alleges that Meta relied on AI-assisted tools and employee-monitoring data to score and rank workers before cutting about 8,000 jobs in May.

The plaintiffs allege that the process relied on metrics such as work output, software development activity, and AI tool usage that employees could not accrue while on protected leave. By failing to adjust those measurements for time away, the suit alleges, Meta effectively recorded medical leave, maternity leave, and disability-related reductions in output as underperformance.

“Meta did not assemble the termination list through the considered judgment of managers who knew the work,” the complaint says.

Instead, the employees allege, the company relied on systems including its internal AI chatbot, Metamate; AI usage dashboards; employee-trained “second-brain” agents designed to reproduce parts of a worker’s output; activity-monitoring data; and AI-assisted performance and calibration tools.

They allege that Meta ranked employees using internal AI-adoption categories such as “AI Native,” “AI First,” and “AI Enabled,” and that employees’ scores declined when they were away from work. The allegations have not been tested in court.

“These claims lack merit and are not based on facts,” a Meta spokesperson told Business Insider. “Workforce management and organizational decisions were and are made by people, not AI.”

The case comes as Meta has pushed employees to use AI more heavily and tracked adoption through internal dashboards and leaderboards. Other major companies, including Disney, JPMorgan, and Visa, have also begun measuring employee AI usage.

The lawsuit against Meta referenced internal AI programs the company introduced this year. Meta had installed software on many US employees’ computers to capture keystrokes and mouse movements as training data for its AI models, prompting employee protests over privacy and the program’s mandatory nature, Business Insider reported in April. The lawsuit alleges that data from this monitoring program also helped feed Meta’s layoff-selection systems.

Meta paused the program in June after an internal leak made the data widely accessible across the company.

Meta also introduced a performance system called Checkpoint this year, placing greater emphasis on outcomes and giving the company’s top-rated workers significantly larger bonuses. The lawsuit alleges that an AI-enabled element of Checkpoint made employee AI adoption a “core assessment metric.”

The complaint says several employees were selected for layoffs while on approved leave or shortly after returning from it. One engineer alleged that his manager blamed a lower rating on the “broken time” caused by an injury that prevented him from working. Another employee says a manager warned that taking medically approved leave would lead senior leadership to “definitely” nominate him for layoffs.

The employees are asking a judge to pause their terminations while their claims proceed in arbitration and to order an independent audit of Meta’s layoff selection process. They also want Meta to recalculate the selections without counting protected leave or disability accommodations against workers.

The plaintiffs, who have chosen to remain anonymous, worked at Meta across several states, including California, Washington, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Florida.

Reuters first reported on the lawsuit on Tuesday.

Have a tip? Contact Pranav Dixit via email at pranavdixit@protonmail.com or Signal at 1-408-905-9124. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here’s our guide to sharing information securely.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *